How will our curated, photo-based lives clash with the freewheeling, meme-heavy and often unhinged world of Twitter? So far, it’s strange, unfamiliar – and kind of fun. Some have raised the question of a potential culture clash between Instagram and a Twitter-like service.
#Any do google android#
We tested the app from the US, but it’s now live in Apple and Google Android app stores in more than 100 countries including Britain, Australia, Canada and Japan. It also allows users to share up to 10 photos in a single post – the same limit that exists on Instagram – as opposed to Twitter’s limit of four images. Unlike Twitter, Threads does not seem to use hashtags and does not have a feature that allows users to search for specific text or phrases. The feed was slick and easy to read, though for now it was populated largely with accounts I did not yet follow or care about – perhaps an issue that will resolve itself as more people sign up. Using Threads felt like a fever dream in which Twitter and Instagram had a more usable brain child. Posts are limited to 500 characters, which is more than Twitter’s 280-character threshold, and can include links, photos and videos up to five minutes long. Opening the app reveals buttons to like, repost, reply to or quote a “thread”, and counters showing the number of likes and replies that a post has received. Threads felt like a fever dream in which Twitter and Instagram had a more usable brain child Threads offers an eerily Twitter-like microblogging experience. For now, you can follow me at How it works I was left wondering if I should make a separate Threads account based on my personal Instagram page, but that’s a question for another time. Threads can only be accessed by integrating an existing Instagram username to sign up – meaning if you don’t have an account, you have to get one to enter the new Threads platform.
#Any do google professional#
The app asked me to connect my Instagram account to sign up, and I switched over from my personal to my professional page – sorry, readers, I will not be revealing my finsta here.
I started by searching “Threads” in the app store, scrolled through some small apps unfortunately also named Threads (RIP to those, inevitably), and clicked on Threads by Meta. It pulled a sample task I had entered into any.do for testing (assemble weedwacker).The debut revealed an easy-to-use, intuitive user experience that easily integrates with Instagram.
Here are some screenshots of the 'zap' setup. I spent a while figuring this out, I hope it helps someone else. (Edit: I will probably pay for it eventually so I can add a third action that deletes the tasks once copied, right now that has to be done periodically by hand)
#Any do google free#
So far it is working adequately with the free zapier plan, but I may have to start paying for it if it continues to work well and I use it enough, as I will hit the free plan task execution limit. It won't come close to what IFTTT offered, but all I care about is quick, ubiquitous capture, and this gets it done. You could do this with other lists/projects as well, but you have to build an integration for each one in Zapier. My solution was to create an 'Inbox' list in Any.do, and sync new items from that list to my Todoist inbox. However, it is possible to sync Any.do with Todoist via Zapier. In fact, I played with Any.do to see if it was a viable Todoist replacement, and for me it is not. Several other list apps are compatible with the Assistant "Notes and Lists" functionality (why has Todoist not done this integration?) including Any.do. I was not happy with the other workarounds posted, so I came up with a new(?) one. As has been discussed in this sub before, Google's recent changes to Assistant prevent the excellent IFTTT integration with Todoist that many of us have enjoyed for years.
0 kommentar(er)
